Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Maintainability of writ petition - Money Laundering - The Court evaluated the contention that the applicants had engaged in dilatory tactics. It concluded that the applications made by the accused, including bail applications, were legitimate exercises of their rights and not attempts to unduly delay proceedings. - While acknowledging the gravity of the alleged offenses, the Court determined that the seriousness of the allegations alone does not preclude the grant of bail, especially when statutory conditions for release under Section 436-A CrPC are met. - Ultimately, the Court granted bail to both applicants, subject to them furnishing personal and surety bonds with specific conditions.
Maintainability of writ petition - Money Laundering - The Court evaluated the contention that the applicants had engaged in dilatory tactics. It concluded that the applications made by the accused, including bail applications, were legitimate exercises of their rights and not attempts to unduly delay proceedings. - While acknowledging the gravity of the alleged offenses, the Court determined that the seriousness of the allegations alone does not preclude the grant of bail, especially when statutory conditions for release under Section 436-A CrPC are met. - Ultimately, the Court granted bail to both applicants, subject to them furnishing personal and surety bonds with specific conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.