Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Process amounting to manufacture - Change in Tariff Heading - buying tubes (stainless steel pipes) and then undertaking certain processes thereon, such as, upsetting, heat treatment, inspection, testing, threading and external coating, so that the pipes can be used for the purposes of oil drilling - The Tribunal finds that the processes undertaken by the appellant do not amount to 'manufacture,' citing precedents and the lack of substantial changes in the character or end-use of the products. - The Tribunal dismisses the Revenue's argument that a change in the tariff heading implies 'manufacture,' stating that such changes do not necessarily indicate manufacturing processes.
Process amounting to manufacture - Change in Tariff Heading - buying tubes (stainless steel pipes) and then undertaking certain processes thereon, such as, upsetting, heat treatment, inspection, testing, threading and external coating, so that the pipes can be used for the purposes of oil drilling - The Tribunal finds that the processes undertaken by the appellant do not amount to 'manufacture,' citing precedents and the lack of substantial changes in the character or end-use of the products. - The Tribunal dismisses the Revenue's argument that a change in the tariff heading implies 'manufacture,' stating that such changes do not necessarily indicate manufacturing processes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.