Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 41(1) - interest waived by the Bank - The appellant contended that the waiver of liability by the bank should not be chargeable to tax under Section 41(1) of the Act. The High Court examined the provisions of Section 41(1) and emphasized that for it to apply, there must have been an allowance or deduction made in the assessment for the loss or expenditure incurred by the assessee. In this case, no such allowance or deduction had been made. Additionally, the Court concluded that the waiver of the loan amounted to the cessation of a liability other than trading liability, making Section 41(1) inapplicable. Consequently, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee.
Addition u/s 41(1) - interest waived by the Bank - The appellant contended that the waiver of liability by the bank should not be chargeable to tax under Section 41(1) of the Act. The High Court examined the provisions of Section 41(1) and emphasized that for it to apply, there must have been an allowance or deduction made in the assessment for the loss or expenditure incurred by the assessee. In this case, no such allowance or deduction had been made. Additionally, the Court concluded that the waiver of the loan amounted to the cessation of a liability other than trading liability, making Section 41(1) inapplicable. Consequently, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.