Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Division of shares among the deceased's children - Interpretation of will - To be treated as part of her "movable properties" or not - The High Court upheld the CLB's interpretation that the shares in question fell within the purview of "movable properties" bequeathed by the will. The court observed that despite the absence of explicit mention of the shares, the will's intention to equally distribute all movable and immovable properties among the deceased's children was clear. - The court found the allotment of additional shares in the appellant companies to one of the children (represented by the appellants) to be done without proper authority, violating the provisions of the Companies Act. It deemed the CLB's decision to cancel this allotment as justified.
Division of shares among the deceased's children - Interpretation of will - To be treated as part of her "movable properties" or not - The High Court upheld the CLB's interpretation that the shares in question fell within the purview of "movable properties" bequeathed by the will. The court observed that despite the absence of explicit mention of the shares, the will's intention to equally distribute all movable and immovable properties among the deceased's children was clear. - The court found the allotment of additional shares in the appellant companies to one of the children (represented by the appellants) to be done without proper authority, violating the provisions of the Companies Act. It deemed the CLB's decision to cancel this allotment as justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.