Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Principles of natural justice - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's argument regarding the violation of procedural fairness, as the impugned order failed to provide adequate opportunity for personal hearing, thereby infringing upon principles of natural justice. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside by the High Court. Regarding the objection related to the pendency of a previous writ petition, the Court clarified that no interim order was in effect and left it open for the petitioner to raise objections on merits before the respondent-authority.
Principles of natural justice - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's argument regarding the violation of procedural fairness, as the impugned order failed to provide adequate opportunity for personal hearing, thereby infringing upon principles of natural justice. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside by the High Court. Regarding the objection related to the pendency of a previous writ petition, the Court clarified that no interim order was in effect and left it open for the petitioner to raise objections on merits before the respondent-authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.