Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Assessment u/s 153C - Additions made by revenue based on search findings in group cases of M/s SRS mining and its partners - The Tribunal noted that the AO of the assessee received the satisfaction note from the AO of the searched person. Based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court, it was determined that the assessment for AY 2015-16 was without jurisdiction as it fell outside the allowable period for assessment under section 153C. Consequently, the assessment for AY 2015-16 was quashed. - The Tribunal found that the additions were based solely on the incriminating material and the statement of an individual, which was later retracted. It was held that the material in question did not directly implicate the assessee, nor was there any corroborative evidence to support the addition. Therefore, the additions made for AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18 were deemed unsustainable, leading to their deletion.
Assessment u/s 153C - Additions made by revenue based on search findings in group cases of M/s SRS mining and its partners - The Tribunal noted that the AO of the assessee received the satisfaction note from the AO of the searched person. Based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court, it was determined that the assessment for AY 2015-16 was without jurisdiction as it fell outside the allowable period for assessment under section 153C. Consequently, the assessment for AY 2015-16 was quashed. - The Tribunal found that the additions were based solely on the incriminating material and the statement of an individual, which was later retracted. It was held that the material in question did not directly implicate the assessee, nor was there any corroborative evidence to support the addition. Therefore, the additions made for AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18 were deemed unsustainable, leading to their deletion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
