Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Assessment u/s 153C - Additions made by revenue based on search findings in group cases of M/s SRS mining and its partners - The Tribunal noted that the AO of the assessee received the satisfaction note from the AO of the searched person. Based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court, it was determined that the assessment for AY 2015-16 was without jurisdiction as it fell outside the allowable period for assessment under section 153C. Consequently, the assessment for AY 2015-16 was quashed. - The Tribunal found that the additions were based solely on the incriminating material and the statement of an individual, which was later retracted. It was held that the material in question did not directly implicate the assessee, nor was there any corroborative evidence to support the addition. Therefore, the additions made for AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18 were deemed unsustainable, leading to their deletion.
Assessment u/s 153C - Additions made by revenue based on search findings in group cases of M/s SRS mining and its partners - The Tribunal noted that the AO of the assessee received the satisfaction note from the AO of the searched person. Based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court, it was determined that the assessment for AY 2015-16 was without jurisdiction as it fell outside the allowable period for assessment under section 153C. Consequently, the assessment for AY 2015-16 was quashed. - The Tribunal found that the additions were based solely on the incriminating material and the statement of an individual, which was later retracted. It was held that the material in question did not directly implicate the assessee, nor was there any corroborative evidence to support the addition. Therefore, the additions made for AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18 were deemed unsustainable, leading to their deletion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
