Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
TP Adjustment - selection of most appropriate method (MAM) - Resale Price Method or Transactional Net Margin Method - Introduction of Fresh Comparables - Removal of 3% Filter - The Tribunal upholds the adoption of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) over Resale Price Method (RPM), citing subsequent TNMM usage and functional comparability. It supports the introduction of new comparables and the rejection of the 3% filter due to marketing intensity. The Tribunal confirms the deletion of additions based on selected comparables' margin comparison with the appellant.
TP Adjustment - selection of most appropriate method (MAM) - Resale Price Method or Transactional Net Margin Method - Introduction of Fresh Comparables - Removal of 3% Filter - The Tribunal upholds the adoption of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) over Resale Price Method (RPM), citing subsequent TNMM usage and functional comparability. It supports the introduction of new comparables and the rejection of the 3% filter due to marketing intensity. The Tribunal confirms the deletion of additions based on selected comparables' margin comparison with the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.