Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CIRP - denial of rights to be heard to protect the Financial Interest of Hundreds of Home Buyers / Allottees - Applicability of Threshold - joint filing by either 100 allottees or 10% of the total number of allottees of the same real estate project, whichever is less - The Tribunal noted that the appellant and co-petitioners, representing various projects within the township, did not meet the specified threshold for initiating CIRP, as they did not collectively belong to the same real estate project or phase. - The NCLAT concluded that the appeal lacks merit based on the presented arguments and evidence. It was determined that the application for initiating CIRP was not maintainable in law, affirming the decision of the Adjudicating Authority.
CIRP - denial of rights to be heard to protect the Financial Interest of Hundreds of Home Buyers / Allottees - Applicability of Threshold - joint filing by either 100 allottees or 10% of the total number of allottees of the same real estate project, whichever is less - The Tribunal noted that the appellant and co-petitioners, representing various projects within the township, did not meet the specified threshold for initiating CIRP, as they did not collectively belong to the same real estate project or phase. - The NCLAT concluded that the appeal lacks merit based on the presented arguments and evidence. It was determined that the application for initiating CIRP was not maintainable in law, affirming the decision of the Adjudicating Authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
