Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Dishonor of Cheque - Ascertaining nature of transaction - whether a criminal proceeding can be initiated and an accused held guilty when there is already a civil court decree concerning the same transaction - The Supreme Court acknowledges the conflicting nature of civil and criminal proceedings concerning the same issue and transaction. However, it emphasizes that the standard of proof and burden of evidence in civil and criminal cases are different. - the Supreme Court clarifies that while civil court decisions may have persuasive value, they are not binding on criminal courts, except for limited purposes such as sentence or damages. - the Supreme Court concludes that the criminal proceedings, including the conviction and damages imposed by lower courts, are unsustainable. It asserts that the criminal court must abide by the civil court's declaration regarding the nature of the cheque involved.
Dishonor of Cheque - Ascertaining nature of transaction - whether a criminal proceeding can be initiated and an accused held guilty when there is already a civil court decree concerning the same transaction - The Supreme Court acknowledges the conflicting nature of civil and criminal proceedings concerning the same issue and transaction. However, it emphasizes that the standard of proof and burden of evidence in civil and criminal cases are different. - the Supreme Court clarifies that while civil court decisions may have persuasive value, they are not binding on criminal courts, except for limited purposes such as sentence or damages. - the Supreme Court concludes that the criminal proceedings, including the conviction and damages imposed by lower courts, are unsustainable. It asserts that the criminal court must abide by the civil court's declaration regarding the nature of the cheque involved.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.