Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Violation of principles of natural justice - technical glitch - Despite the Department's submission that the petitioner had been informed in advance about the correct email address, the notices were still sent to the wrong address due to an error. Consequently, the High Court finds that the petitioner was not afforded a fair opportunity for a personal hearing, primarily due to technical errors in the communication process. - Therefore, the High Court sets aside the OIO on the grounds of violating principles of natural justice.
Violation of principles of natural justice - technical glitch - Despite the Department's submission that the petitioner had been informed in advance about the correct email address, the notices were still sent to the wrong address due to an error. Consequently, the High Court finds that the petitioner was not afforded a fair opportunity for a personal hearing, primarily due to technical errors in the communication process. - Therefore, the High Court sets aside the OIO on the grounds of violating principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.