Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty - Bill of Entry for clearance of ‘Sweet Pearl P200’ classified under 29054900 - Revenue reclassified the goods under 21069060 - The burden of proof was on Revenue to justify the reclassification, which they failed to do adequately. The Tribunal upheld the appellant's classification, emphasizing the importance of Revenue's burden of proof and the correctness of the proposed classification. The appeal by Revenue for imposing a penalty was dismissed.
Levy of penalty - Bill of Entry for clearance of ‘Sweet Pearl P200’ classified under 29054900 - Revenue reclassified the goods under 21069060 - The burden of proof was on Revenue to justify the reclassification, which they failed to do adequately. The Tribunal upheld the appellant's classification, emphasizing the importance of Revenue's burden of proof and the correctness of the proposed classification. The appeal by Revenue for imposing a penalty was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.