Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of the Order-in-Original - Adjudication of show cause notice - The petitioner argued that they were not given a fair opportunity to present their case and relevant documents. The High Court agreed, emphasizing the importance of fairness and clarity in quasi-judicial adjudication. It held that the adjudicating officer should have considered the preliminary objections first and provided notice of the intention to decide the show cause notice concurrently. Therefore, the impugned Order-in-Original was quashed, and the proceedings were remanded for a fresh decision, ensuring fairness and consideration of all relevant issues.
Validity of the Order-in-Original - Adjudication of show cause notice - The petitioner argued that they were not given a fair opportunity to present their case and relevant documents. The High Court agreed, emphasizing the importance of fairness and clarity in quasi-judicial adjudication. It held that the adjudicating officer should have considered the preliminary objections first and provided notice of the intention to decide the show cause notice concurrently. Therefore, the impugned Order-in-Original was quashed, and the proceedings were remanded for a fresh decision, ensuring fairness and consideration of all relevant issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.