Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance as per order u/s 144C - default in filling of form 35A - The appellant filed a corrected Form No. 35A. The Tribunal ruled that this correction did not constitute filing beyond the time limit, and thus upheld the appellant's contention. - On the issue of disallowed expenses, the Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate the legitimacy of the claimed expenses related to the sale of a residential property. The assessing officer's rejection of these expenses solely based on procedural grounds was deemed unjustified. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the assessing officer to review the supporting documents and allow the expenses accordingly.
Disallowance as per order u/s 144C - default in filling of form 35A - The appellant filed a corrected Form No. 35A. The Tribunal ruled that this correction did not constitute filing beyond the time limit, and thus upheld the appellant's contention. - On the issue of disallowed expenses, the Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate the legitimacy of the claimed expenses related to the sale of a residential property. The assessing officer's rejection of these expenses solely based on procedural grounds was deemed unjustified. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the assessing officer to review the supporting documents and allow the expenses accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.