Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Constitutional power of the Central Government over State - The imposition of a Net Borrowing Ceiling on the state - The inclusion of State-Owned Enterprises in the borrowing restrictions - The adjustment of over-borrowing from previous fiscal years against the current year's borrowing limit - Significantly, the Supreme Court decided to refer these constitutional questions to a larger bench, acknowledging the lack of previous authoritative interpretation on Article 293 and recognizing the potential implications for the federal structure of governance in India. - On the matter of granting interim relief to the state, the Court applied the triple-test criteria: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. The judgment concluded that the state failed to establish a compelling prima facie case, noting discrepancies in the claimed fiscal space for borrowing and highlighting the Union's arguments on over-utilization of borrowing limits.
Constitutional power of the Central Government over State - The imposition of a Net Borrowing Ceiling on the state - The inclusion of State-Owned Enterprises in the borrowing restrictions - The adjustment of over-borrowing from previous fiscal years against the current year's borrowing limit - Significantly, the Supreme Court decided to refer these constitutional questions to a larger bench, acknowledging the lack of previous authoritative interpretation on Article 293 and recognizing the potential implications for the federal structure of governance in India. - On the matter of granting interim relief to the state, the Court applied the triple-test criteria: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. The judgment concluded that the state failed to establish a compelling prima facie case, noting discrepancies in the claimed fiscal space for borrowing and highlighting the Union's arguments on over-utilization of borrowing limits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
