Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Seeking revocation of the Cancellation of the GST registration retrospectively - petitioner not found functioning from the given address - The High Court examined the petitioner's challenge against the retrospective cancellation of their GST registration. The petitioner argued that the cancellation was based on a mistaken identity, as the Field Visit Report cited was not related to them. The Court acknowledged the petitioner's concerns and directed the competent authority to review the revocation petition and address the alleged errors within two weeks. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to pursue additional legal recourse if necessary.
Seeking revocation of the Cancellation of the GST registration retrospectively - petitioner not found functioning from the given address - The High Court examined the petitioner's challenge against the retrospective cancellation of their GST registration. The petitioner argued that the cancellation was based on a mistaken identity, as the Field Visit Report cited was not related to them. The Court acknowledged the petitioner's concerns and directed the competent authority to review the revocation petition and address the alleged errors within two weeks. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to pursue additional legal recourse if necessary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
