Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Seeking revocation of the Cancellation of the GST registration retrospectively - petitioner not found functioning from the given address - The High Court examined the petitioner's challenge against the retrospective cancellation of their GST registration. The petitioner argued that the cancellation was based on a mistaken identity, as the Field Visit Report cited was not related to them. The Court acknowledged the petitioner's concerns and directed the competent authority to review the revocation petition and address the alleged errors within two weeks. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to pursue additional legal recourse if necessary.
Seeking revocation of the Cancellation of the GST registration retrospectively - petitioner not found functioning from the given address - The High Court examined the petitioner's challenge against the retrospective cancellation of their GST registration. The petitioner argued that the cancellation was based on a mistaken identity, as the Field Visit Report cited was not related to them. The Court acknowledged the petitioner's concerns and directed the competent authority to review the revocation petition and address the alleged errors within two weeks. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to pursue additional legal recourse if necessary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.