Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Exemption from GST - Pure services or not - supply of service for turpentine treatment - The MOU provided by the applicant indicates the provision of security guards to a Panchayat Samiti, which is considered a local authority. However, the service of security does not directly relate to functions entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G of the Constitution. - The absence of specific work orders or contracts provided by the applicant makes it difficult to determine the nature of these services. However, based on the description provided, it appears that these services involve the supply of goods along with manpower, making them composite supplies and not pure services. Consequently, they do not qualify for exemption under the notification. - The Advance Ruling Authority concludes that the applicant is not eligible for exemption benefits under Sr. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
Exemption from GST - Pure services or not - supply of service for turpentine treatment - The MOU provided by the applicant indicates the provision of security guards to a Panchayat Samiti, which is considered a local authority. However, the service of security does not directly relate to functions entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G of the Constitution. - The absence of specific work orders or contracts provided by the applicant makes it difficult to determine the nature of these services. However, based on the description provided, it appears that these services involve the supply of goods along with manpower, making them composite supplies and not pure services. Consequently, they do not qualify for exemption under the notification. - The Advance Ruling Authority concludes that the applicant is not eligible for exemption benefits under Sr. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
