Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Disallowance of interest u/s 36(1)(iii) - The AO had disallowed the interest claimed by the assessee on advances made to its Director, citing a lack of nexus between the advances and the business activities of the assessee. The assessee contended that the advances were made for business purposes and out of commercial expediency. - The Appellate Tribunal recognized the importance of establishing a clear nexus between the advances and the business activities of the assessee. It also emphasized the need to verify the availability of interest-free funds with the assessee at the time of advancing the loan. - The ITAT ordered the AO to examine the additional evidence provided by the assessee and provide an opportunity for the assessee to substantiate its case.
Disallowance of interest u/s 36(1)(iii) - The AO had disallowed the interest claimed by the assessee on advances made to its Director, citing a lack of nexus between the advances and the business activities of the assessee. The assessee contended that the advances were made for business purposes and out of commercial expediency. - The Appellate Tribunal recognized the importance of establishing a clear nexus between the advances and the business activities of the assessee. It also emphasized the need to verify the availability of interest-free funds with the assessee at the time of advancing the loan. - The ITAT ordered the AO to examine the additional evidence provided by the assessee and provide an opportunity for the assessee to substantiate its case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
