Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Condonation of delay - delay of 1607 days in filing the appeal by the assessee before ITAT - The Tribunal acknowledged the significant delay but emphasized that the length of the delay should not be the sole determining factor. It considered the reasons provided by the assessee, including ill health and financial stress, and compared the delay to similar cases where longer delays had been condoned. Ultimately, the Tribunal found sufficient cause for the delay and decided to condone it. - Regarding the addition u/s 69, the Tribunal noted that the orders of the AO and CIT(Appeals) were ex-parte. It directed the case to be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Condonation of delay - delay of 1607 days in filing the appeal by the assessee before ITAT - The Tribunal acknowledged the significant delay but emphasized that the length of the delay should not be the sole determining factor. It considered the reasons provided by the assessee, including ill health and financial stress, and compared the delay to similar cases where longer delays had been condoned. Ultimately, the Tribunal found sufficient cause for the delay and decided to condone it. - Regarding the addition u/s 69, the Tribunal noted that the orders of the AO and CIT(Appeals) were ex-parte. It directed the case to be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.