TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Condonation of delay - delay of 1607 days in filing the appeal by the assessee before ITAT - The Tribunal acknowledged the significant delay but emphasized that the length of the delay should not be the sole determining factor. It considered the reasons provided by the assessee, including ill health and financial stress, and compared the delay to similar cases where longer delays had been condoned. Ultimately, the Tribunal found sufficient cause for the delay and decided to condone it. - Regarding the addition u/s 69, the Tribunal noted that the orders of the AO and CIT(Appeals) were ex-parte. It directed the case to be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Condonation of delay - delay of 1607 days in filing the appeal by the assessee before ITAT - The Tribunal acknowledged the significant delay but emphasized that the length of the delay should not be the sole determining factor. It considered the reasons provided by the assessee, including ill health and financial stress, and compared the delay to similar cases where longer delays had been condoned. Ultimately, the Tribunal found sufficient cause for the delay and decided to condone it. - Regarding the addition u/s 69, the Tribunal noted that the orders of the AO and CIT(Appeals) were ex-parte. It directed the case to be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
