Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
LTCG - Deduction claimed u/s 54 - ITAT allowed claim - The High Court notes that the issue revolves around long-term capital gains arising from an Apartment Buyers Agreement entered into before the property sale. - The ITAT's conclusion, aligning with previous case law, states that possession of the property was completed within three years from the sale, entitling the assessees to relief. Referring to precedent, the High Court reaffirms that the construction commenced within the mandated time frame, and the assessees fulfill the conditions under section 54 of the Act. The High Court dismisses the appeal of the Revenue, finding no substantial question of law raised and upholds the ITAT's decision.
LTCG - Deduction claimed u/s 54 - ITAT allowed claim - The High Court notes that the issue revolves around long-term capital gains arising from an Apartment Buyers Agreement entered into before the property sale. - The ITAT's conclusion, aligning with previous case law, states that possession of the property was completed within three years from the sale, entitling the assessees to relief. Referring to precedent, the High Court reaffirms that the construction commenced within the mandated time frame, and the assessees fulfill the conditions under section 54 of the Act. The High Court dismisses the appeal of the Revenue, finding no substantial question of law raised and upholds the ITAT's decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.