Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
LTCG - Deduction claimed u/s 54 - ITAT allowed claim - The High Court notes that the issue revolves around long-term capital gains arising from an Apartment Buyers Agreement entered into before the property sale. - The ITAT's conclusion, aligning with previous case law, states that possession of the property was completed within three years from the sale, entitling the assessees to relief. Referring to precedent, the High Court reaffirms that the construction commenced within the mandated time frame, and the assessees fulfill the conditions under section 54 of the Act. The High Court dismisses the appeal of the Revenue, finding no substantial question of law raised and upholds the ITAT's decision.
LTCG - Deduction claimed u/s 54 - ITAT allowed claim - The High Court notes that the issue revolves around long-term capital gains arising from an Apartment Buyers Agreement entered into before the property sale. - The ITAT's conclusion, aligning with previous case law, states that possession of the property was completed within three years from the sale, entitling the assessees to relief. Referring to precedent, the High Court reaffirms that the construction commenced within the mandated time frame, and the assessees fulfill the conditions under section 54 of the Act. The High Court dismisses the appeal of the Revenue, finding no substantial question of law raised and upholds the ITAT's decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.