Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - inadequate v/s no enquiry - unsecured loan, difference in stock and late payment of PF & ESI - The Tribunal reviewed each of the contested issues and found that the AO had adequately considered them during the assessment. It observed that the appellant had provided relevant details and explanations, which were duly examined by the AO. As a result, the Tribunal determined that there was no basis for considering the assessment order as erroneous under Section 263.
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - inadequate v/s no enquiry - unsecured loan, difference in stock and late payment of PF & ESI - The Tribunal reviewed each of the contested issues and found that the AO had adequately considered them during the assessment. It observed that the appellant had provided relevant details and explanations, which were duly examined by the AO. As a result, the Tribunal determined that there was no basis for considering the assessment order as erroneous under Section 263.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.