Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Seeking defreezing of petitioner’s bank account - export under Duty Drawback Scheme under Section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The petitioner claimed duty drawback under the Duty Drawback Scheme for goods exported through Tuticorin Sea Customs. However, due to the petitioner's inability to submit a bank realization statement at the time of consideration, their claim was rejected. The High Court, after considering the submissions, directed the remittance of the matter for reconsideration. The impugned orders were set aside, and the respondents were instructed to reevaluate the claim, considering the bank realization statement submitted by the petitioner.
Seeking defreezing of petitioner’s bank account - export under Duty Drawback Scheme under Section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The petitioner claimed duty drawback under the Duty Drawback Scheme for goods exported through Tuticorin Sea Customs. However, due to the petitioner's inability to submit a bank realization statement at the time of consideration, their claim was rejected. The High Court, after considering the submissions, directed the remittance of the matter for reconsideration. The impugned orders were set aside, and the respondents were instructed to reevaluate the claim, considering the bank realization statement submitted by the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
