Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Seeking defreezing of petitioner’s bank account - export under Duty Drawback Scheme under Section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The petitioner claimed duty drawback under the Duty Drawback Scheme for goods exported through Tuticorin Sea Customs. However, due to the petitioner's inability to submit a bank realization statement at the time of consideration, their claim was rejected. The High Court, after considering the submissions, directed the remittance of the matter for reconsideration. The impugned orders were set aside, and the respondents were instructed to reevaluate the claim, considering the bank realization statement submitted by the petitioner.
Seeking defreezing of petitioner’s bank account - export under Duty Drawback Scheme under Section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The petitioner claimed duty drawback under the Duty Drawback Scheme for goods exported through Tuticorin Sea Customs. However, due to the petitioner's inability to submit a bank realization statement at the time of consideration, their claim was rejected. The High Court, after considering the submissions, directed the remittance of the matter for reconsideration. The impugned orders were set aside, and the respondents were instructed to reevaluate the claim, considering the bank realization statement submitted by the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
