Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the appellant had connived with the importers - The Tribunal in its earlier order upheld confiscation of the goods but allowed redemption on payment of redemption fine and penalty on the enhanced value. - The Tribunal reviewed the evidence and found no proof of the appellant's involvement in the importation violations. As there was no penalty under Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, the penalty under Section 112(a) was not sustainable.
Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the appellant had connived with the importers - The Tribunal in its earlier order upheld confiscation of the goods but allowed redemption on payment of redemption fine and penalty on the enhanced value. - The Tribunal reviewed the evidence and found no proof of the appellant's involvement in the importation violations. As there was no penalty under Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, the penalty under Section 112(a) was not sustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
