Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
541 to 560 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Proceedings against importer when the sole proprietor of M/s Ganpati Enterprises had expired - mis -declaration and short payment of duty - imposition of penalty on appellant - The Tribunal ruled that proceedings cannot continue under the Customs Act following the death of the sole proprietor. Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal emphasized that there are no provisions to continue proceedings against the legal heir of a deceased proprietor. - Regarding the imposition of penalties, the Tribunal found no evidence linking one of the appellants to the import of the consignment. Therefore, no penalty was imposed on this appellant.
Proceedings against importer when the sole proprietor of M/s Ganpati Enterprises had expired - mis -declaration and short payment of duty - imposition of penalty on appellant - The Tribunal ruled that proceedings cannot continue under the Customs Act following the death of the sole proprietor. Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal emphasized that there are no provisions to continue proceedings against the legal heir of a deceased proprietor. - Regarding the imposition of penalties, the Tribunal found no evidence linking one of the appellants to the import of the consignment. Therefore, no penalty was imposed on this appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.