Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cenvat credit for service tax paid on 'management fee' and 'common sharing of Head office services' - invoices from the service provider were not in the prescribed format - The Appellate Tribunal concluded that there was a reasonable nexus between the services provided and the appellant's activities, justifying the admissibility of the cenvat credit. Despite minor procedural defects in the invoices, the Tribunal upheld the admissibility of the credit, emphasizing that the invoices contained the necessary particulars. Furthermore, the Tribunal found no suppression of facts by the appellant, rendering the invocation of the extended period of limitation by the Department untenable.
Cenvat credit for service tax paid on 'management fee' and 'common sharing of Head office services' - invoices from the service provider were not in the prescribed format - The Appellate Tribunal concluded that there was a reasonable nexus between the services provided and the appellant's activities, justifying the admissibility of the cenvat credit. Despite minor procedural defects in the invoices, the Tribunal upheld the admissibility of the credit, emphasizing that the invoices contained the necessary particulars. Furthermore, the Tribunal found no suppression of facts by the appellant, rendering the invocation of the extended period of limitation by the Department untenable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.