Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Process amounting to manufacture - The appellant's contention was that the activities—testing, labeling, and packing—performed on imported modems did not amount to manufacture, as the modems were already in a marketable state upon import. They argued that these processes were essential quality checks and did not alter the modem's identity, thus not constituting manufacture. - The Tribunal held that testing, labeling, and packing of modems, coupled with the inclusion of additional accessories, amounted to making the product marketable to the consumer, thereby falling within the definition of manufacture.
Process amounting to manufacture - The appellant's contention was that the activities—testing, labeling, and packing—performed on imported modems did not amount to manufacture, as the modems were already in a marketable state upon import. They argued that these processes were essential quality checks and did not alter the modem's identity, thus not constituting manufacture. - The Tribunal held that testing, labeling, and packing of modems, coupled with the inclusion of additional accessories, amounted to making the product marketable to the consumer, thereby falling within the definition of manufacture.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.