Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Violation of principles of natural justice - The court observes that the petitioner, a timber trader, lacks familiarity with advanced technology and online portals. It notes that notices were indeed uploaded only through the portal, which created difficulty for the petitioner to access them. The court, therefore, accepts the petitioner's contention that he was not afforded a fair opportunity of hearing. - While acknowledging that Section 169(d) allows for notice issuance through online portals, the court emphasizes that other modes of communication are also available under Section 169 of the TNGST Act 2017. It points out that the petitioner's lack of technological proficiency warrants consideration of alternative communication methods.
Violation of principles of natural justice - The court observes that the petitioner, a timber trader, lacks familiarity with advanced technology and online portals. It notes that notices were indeed uploaded only through the portal, which created difficulty for the petitioner to access them. The court, therefore, accepts the petitioner's contention that he was not afforded a fair opportunity of hearing. - While acknowledging that Section 169(d) allows for notice issuance through online portals, the court emphasizes that other modes of communication are also available under Section 169 of the TNGST Act 2017. It points out that the petitioner's lack of technological proficiency warrants consideration of alternative communication methods.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
