Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of pre-deposit alongwith interest - CIRP - Approval of Resolution Plan under IBC - Analyzing the insolvency proceedings and the subsequent approval of the resolution plan, the court concluded that the tax liability against the petitioner had been extinguished. Therefore, the rejection of the refund application by the revenue authority was deemed misconstrued and misdirected. The court emphasized the entitlement of the petitioner to the refund, considering the legal precedent established by the Supreme Court regarding resolution plans.
Refund of pre-deposit alongwith interest - CIRP - Approval of Resolution Plan under IBC - Analyzing the insolvency proceedings and the subsequent approval of the resolution plan, the court concluded that the tax liability against the petitioner had been extinguished. Therefore, the rejection of the refund application by the revenue authority was deemed misconstrued and misdirected. The court emphasized the entitlement of the petitioner to the refund, considering the legal precedent established by the Supreme Court regarding resolution plans.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.