Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - The petitioner contended that they were not served the notices and thus were unable to reply, resulting in ex-parte demands being raised against them. The High Court found merit in the petitioner's argument regarding the lack of access to the notices and set aside the impugned orders, remitting the matter for re-adjudication. The court emphasized the importance of providing opportunities for parties to be heard and directed the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks, with the matter to be re-adjudicated by the Proper Officer in accordance with the law.
Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - The petitioner contended that they were not served the notices and thus were unable to reply, resulting in ex-parte demands being raised against them. The High Court found merit in the petitioner's argument regarding the lack of access to the notices and set aside the impugned orders, remitting the matter for re-adjudication. The court emphasized the importance of providing opportunities for parties to be heard and directed the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks, with the matter to be re-adjudicated by the Proper Officer in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
