Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Reversal of excess input tax credit availed - bonafide mistake - The petitioner argued that the incorrect claiming of IGST instead of CGST was a bonafide mistake and should not lead to the disallowance of the input tax credit. However, the Court held that since the petitioner failed to move any application within the prescribed time limit for correcting the mistake or claiming the refund of the IGST, it could not intervene to amend the statutory provisions.
Reversal of excess input tax credit availed - bonafide mistake - The petitioner argued that the incorrect claiming of IGST instead of CGST was a bonafide mistake and should not lead to the disallowance of the input tax credit. However, the Court held that since the petitioner failed to move any application within the prescribed time limit for correcting the mistake or claiming the refund of the IGST, it could not intervene to amend the statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.