Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Reversal of excess input tax credit availed - bonafide mistake - The petitioner argued that the incorrect claiming of IGST instead of CGST was a bonafide mistake and should not lead to the disallowance of the input tax credit. However, the Court held that since the petitioner failed to move any application within the prescribed time limit for correcting the mistake or claiming the refund of the IGST, it could not intervene to amend the statutory provisions.
Reversal of excess input tax credit availed - bonafide mistake - The petitioner argued that the incorrect claiming of IGST instead of CGST was a bonafide mistake and should not lead to the disallowance of the input tax credit. However, the Court held that since the petitioner failed to move any application within the prescribed time limit for correcting the mistake or claiming the refund of the IGST, it could not intervene to amend the statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.