Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Reversal of excess input tax credit availed - bonafide mistake - The petitioner argued that the incorrect claiming of IGST instead of CGST was a bonafide mistake and should not lead to the disallowance of the input tax credit. However, the Court held that since the petitioner failed to move any application within the prescribed time limit for correcting the mistake or claiming the refund of the IGST, it could not intervene to amend the statutory provisions.
Reversal of excess input tax credit availed - bonafide mistake - The petitioner argued that the incorrect claiming of IGST instead of CGST was a bonafide mistake and should not lead to the disallowance of the input tax credit. However, the Court held that since the petitioner failed to move any application within the prescribed time limit for correcting the mistake or claiming the refund of the IGST, it could not intervene to amend the statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.