Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Reversal of ineligible ITC - The case involved a trader served with a notice to pay/reverse ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to a discrepancy between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B filings. The trader argued that they acted in good faith based on invoices from a selling dealer whose GST registration was subsequently cancelled. Legal precedents were cited to challenge the legality of the notice. The High Court determined that the notice was an intimation under Section 74(5), allowing the trader to address the issue before formal proceedings. The Court directed the trader to take necessary actions or file objections, with the adjudicating officer examining objections and relevant documents before initiating formal proceedings.
Reversal of ineligible ITC - The case involved a trader served with a notice to pay/reverse ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to a discrepancy between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B filings. The trader argued that they acted in good faith based on invoices from a selling dealer whose GST registration was subsequently cancelled. Legal precedents were cited to challenge the legality of the notice. The High Court determined that the notice was an intimation under Section 74(5), allowing the trader to address the issue before formal proceedings. The Court directed the trader to take necessary actions or file objections, with the adjudicating officer examining objections and relevant documents before initiating formal proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
