Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Validity of assessment order - breach of principles of natural justice - During an inspection, the petitioner addressed discrepancies pointed out by the authorities but failed to respond to subsequent notices and participate in assessment proceedings. Despite this, the High Court finds it necessary to interfere with the assessment order, subjecting the petitioner to certain conditions. These include remitting a specified sum towards the disputed tax demand and submitting a reply to the show cause notice within a stipulated period. The Court directs the assessing officer to issue a fresh assessment order within two months, adhering to prescribed procedures.
Validity of assessment order - breach of principles of natural justice - During an inspection, the petitioner addressed discrepancies pointed out by the authorities but failed to respond to subsequent notices and participate in assessment proceedings. Despite this, the High Court finds it necessary to interfere with the assessment order, subjecting the petitioner to certain conditions. These include remitting a specified sum towards the disputed tax demand and submitting a reply to the show cause notice within a stipulated period. The Court directs the assessing officer to issue a fresh assessment order within two months, adhering to prescribed procedures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.