Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Jurisdiction to issue SCN - Ocean Freight - contention of the petitioner is to the effect that, what has been sought to be invoked the Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28/6/2017 in issuing the show cause notice which itself has been struck down by the Division Bench of Gujarat High Court - The petitioner argued that the notice lacked jurisdiction due to the invalidity of the notification. The High Court upheld the petitioner's arguments, emphasizing the illegality of applying an ultra vires notification and the lack of jurisdiction in the show cause notice. It also reaffirmed the interpretation of GST laws established in previous judgments, supporting the petitioner's case. Overall, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the show cause notice and allowing for a refund of taxes paid under protest.
Jurisdiction to issue SCN - Ocean Freight - contention of the petitioner is to the effect that, what has been sought to be invoked the Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28/6/2017 in issuing the show cause notice which itself has been struck down by the Division Bench of Gujarat High Court - The petitioner argued that the notice lacked jurisdiction due to the invalidity of the notification. The High Court upheld the petitioner's arguments, emphasizing the illegality of applying an ultra vires notification and the lack of jurisdiction in the show cause notice. It also reaffirmed the interpretation of GST laws established in previous judgments, supporting the petitioner's case. Overall, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the show cause notice and allowing for a refund of taxes paid under protest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
