Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) erroneously - The supplier made a mistake by filing the return in Form GSTR-1 by specifying total integrated tax (IGST) as zero in the relevant column - The High Court observed that while suppliers may make errors, recipients are equally responsible for rectifying incorrect claims to maintain GST system integrity. However, it noted that in this case, the SGST component did reach the State of Tamil Nadu, contradicting the assessing officer's view. - The Court quashed the impugned order. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for reconsideration, with directions to issue a fresh assessment order within a specified timeframe.
Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) erroneously - The supplier made a mistake by filing the return in Form GSTR-1 by specifying total integrated tax (IGST) as zero in the relevant column - The High Court observed that while suppliers may make errors, recipients are equally responsible for rectifying incorrect claims to maintain GST system integrity. However, it noted that in this case, the SGST component did reach the State of Tamil Nadu, contradicting the assessing officer's view. - The Court quashed the impugned order. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for reconsideration, with directions to issue a fresh assessment order within a specified timeframe.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
