Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Validity of Settlement Commission orders - The case involved petitions seeking directives for the issuance of formal orders under section 245D (4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, reflecting settlement terms pronounced by the Settlement Commission. While petitioners asserted the settlement's conclusion, respondent No. 2 contested, citing discrepancies in official records. - Upon review, the High Court found the affidavit of the Vice President and Member of the Settlement Commission to be conclusive evidence of settlement. Despite respondent No. 2's objections, the High Court directed the Interim Board to issue the requested orders, ensuring the proper administration of justice.
Validity of Settlement Commission orders - The case involved petitions seeking directives for the issuance of formal orders under section 245D (4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, reflecting settlement terms pronounced by the Settlement Commission. While petitioners asserted the settlement's conclusion, respondent No. 2 contested, citing discrepancies in official records. - Upon review, the High Court found the affidavit of the Vice President and Member of the Settlement Commission to be conclusive evidence of settlement. Despite respondent No. 2's objections, the High Court directed the Interim Board to issue the requested orders, ensuring the proper administration of justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.