Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction u/s 80IA(4) on wind mills and solar power plants - Whether each windmill and solar power plant installed by the assessee should be considered as separate undertakings or one undertaking? - The Tribunal, referencing its own previous decisions and the lack of any new material facts or judicial precedents, upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s ruling. It was concluded that each windmill and solar power plant must be treated as separate undertakings for the calculation of deductions under section 80IA(4), thereby dismissing the Revenue's appeal on this ground. - Furthermore, on Applicability of Notional Brought Forward Losses and Depreciation, the Tribunal followed the principles laid down by the High Courts, which stated that losses from eligible businesses, once set off against other income, cannot be notionally carried forward to reduce the profits of the eligible business in subsequent years for the purpose of computing deduction under section 80IA.
Deduction u/s 80IA(4) on wind mills and solar power plants - Whether each windmill and solar power plant installed by the assessee should be considered as separate undertakings or one undertaking? - The Tribunal, referencing its own previous decisions and the lack of any new material facts or judicial precedents, upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s ruling. It was concluded that each windmill and solar power plant must be treated as separate undertakings for the calculation of deductions under section 80IA(4), thereby dismissing the Revenue's appeal on this ground. - Furthermore, on Applicability of Notional Brought Forward Losses and Depreciation, the Tribunal followed the principles laid down by the High Courts, which stated that losses from eligible businesses, once set off against other income, cannot be notionally carried forward to reduce the profits of the eligible business in subsequent years for the purpose of computing deduction under section 80IA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.