Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Validity of order of CESTAT - Redemption for home consumption allowed, despite admitting the fact that the condition of para 2.31 of the Foreign Trade Policy are not satisfied - Scope of the CRO, 2012, which covers Multifunctional and Printers/ Devices (MFDs) along with printers and plotters - The High Court dismissed the appeal, citing a previous judgment addressing similar issues. The Court noted that the goods in question had already been released on payment of duty and other dues. Consequently, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision while leaving the substantial questions of law open for future adjudication.
Validity of order of CESTAT - Redemption for home consumption allowed, despite admitting the fact that the condition of para 2.31 of the Foreign Trade Policy are not satisfied - Scope of the CRO, 2012, which covers Multifunctional and Printers/ Devices (MFDs) along with printers and plotters - The High Court dismissed the appeal, citing a previous judgment addressing similar issues. The Court noted that the goods in question had already been released on payment of duty and other dues. Consequently, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision while leaving the substantial questions of law open for future adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.