Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 29, 2024Case LawsAT
CIRP - Appellant seeks to modify the project completion date from 03.12.2023 to 03.12.2024, as stated in the subsequent certificate issued by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) - correction of error in exercise of inherent jurisdiction of this Tribunal - After considering the submissions of both parties, the Tribunal found that the date mentioned in the judgment accurately reflected the information noticed by the Adjudicating Authority in the impugned order. As such, the Tribunal concluded that there was no mistake or slip in its judgment that warranted correction.
CIRP - Appellant seeks to modify the project completion date from 03.12.2023 to 03.12.2024, as stated in the subsequent certificate issued by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) - correction of error in exercise of inherent jurisdiction of this Tribunal - After considering the submissions of both parties, the Tribunal found that the date mentioned in the judgment accurately reflected the information noticed by the Adjudicating Authority in the impugned order. As such, the Tribunal concluded that there was no mistake or slip in its judgment that warranted correction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
