Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 29, 2024Case LawsAT
Admission of Section 7 application under IBC - The Appellant contests the admission, citing the submission of a One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circular regarding OTS proposals. - The Tribunal acknowledges the OTS proposal and the Bank's 'no objection' for deferring the pronouncement of the order. However, it emphasizes the need for justice and provides an opportunity for the Appellant to deposit the offered amount within 90 days. The Tribunal also addresses the validity of Section 10-A of IBC, directing the deposit of the offered amount within the specified time frame. Overall, the Tribunal focuses on resolving the matter effectively while ensuring fairness and justice.
Admission of Section 7 application under IBC - The Appellant contests the admission, citing the submission of a One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circular regarding OTS proposals. - The Tribunal acknowledges the OTS proposal and the Bank's 'no objection' for deferring the pronouncement of the order. However, it emphasizes the need for justice and provides an opportunity for the Appellant to deposit the offered amount within 90 days. The Tribunal also addresses the validity of Section 10-A of IBC, directing the deposit of the offered amount within the specified time frame. Overall, the Tribunal focuses on resolving the matter effectively while ensuring fairness and justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
