Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 29, 2024Case LawsAT
CIRP - Completion of Real estate project during the Proceedings - Appellant filed an application seeking permission for unsecured and secured financial creditors to vote on the Project Completion Proposal - The Appellant sought permission for financial creditors to vote on a Project Completion Proposal, which was granted by the Tribunal. After overwhelming support in the voting process, the Tribunal permitted the Appellant to implement the Proposal under the supervision of the IRP and in accordance with reverse CIRP principles. The appeal was disposed of, with liberty given to parties to approach the Court for any difficulties during project completion.
CIRP - Completion of Real estate project during the Proceedings - Appellant filed an application seeking permission for unsecured and secured financial creditors to vote on the Project Completion Proposal - The Appellant sought permission for financial creditors to vote on a Project Completion Proposal, which was granted by the Tribunal. After overwhelming support in the voting process, the Tribunal permitted the Appellant to implement the Proposal under the supervision of the IRP and in accordance with reverse CIRP principles. The appeal was disposed of, with liberty given to parties to approach the Court for any difficulties during project completion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
