Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Oppression and Mismanagement - The Appellate Tribunal highlighted the absence of reasoning in the impugned order, especially regarding the direction for an independent forensic audit. It emphasized the necessity of recording reasons to support judicial orders, citing legal precedents. Despite oral submissions, the Appellant failed to file a reply affidavit or supporting documents, leaving the interim order based solely on the petitioner's averments. The Tribunal upheld the interim order for a forensic audit, considering allegations of serious lapses and non-compliance in financial statements and statutory compliances.
Oppression and Mismanagement - The Appellate Tribunal highlighted the absence of reasoning in the impugned order, especially regarding the direction for an independent forensic audit. It emphasized the necessity of recording reasons to support judicial orders, citing legal precedents. Despite oral submissions, the Appellant failed to file a reply affidavit or supporting documents, leaving the interim order based solely on the petitioner's averments. The Tribunal upheld the interim order for a forensic audit, considering allegations of serious lapses and non-compliance in financial statements and statutory compliances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.