Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of duty paid in excess - Admitted tax or not - The Tribunal found that the amounts paid by the appellant were not part of self-assessment and were not reflected in the ER-1 returns. Therefore, they were considered as deposits, and the limitation for refund did not apply. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that the appellant should have challenged the self-assessment before seeking a refund, as the duty was not part of self-assessment. It was clarified that the freight amount was not included in the assessable value, as per previous decisions.
Refund of duty paid in excess - Admitted tax or not - The Tribunal found that the amounts paid by the appellant were not part of self-assessment and were not reflected in the ER-1 returns. Therefore, they were considered as deposits, and the limitation for refund did not apply. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that the appellant should have challenged the self-assessment before seeking a refund, as the duty was not part of self-assessment. It was clarified that the freight amount was not included in the assessable value, as per previous decisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
