Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Refund of duty paid in excess - Admitted tax or not - The Tribunal found that the amounts paid by the appellant were not part of self-assessment and were not reflected in the ER-1 returns. Therefore, they were considered as deposits, and the limitation for refund did not apply. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that the appellant should have challenged the self-assessment before seeking a refund, as the duty was not part of self-assessment. It was clarified that the freight amount was not included in the assessable value, as per previous decisions.
Refund of duty paid in excess - Admitted tax or not - The Tribunal found that the amounts paid by the appellant were not part of self-assessment and were not reflected in the ER-1 returns. Therefore, they were considered as deposits, and the limitation for refund did not apply. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that the appellant should have challenged the self-assessment before seeking a refund, as the duty was not part of self-assessment. It was clarified that the freight amount was not included in the assessable value, as per previous decisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
