Incomplete BIS testing cannot justify reclassification or confiscatory action; declared customs classification restored and enhanced redemption fine s...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3121 to 3140 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Job-worker or manufacturer - Duty liability - The case revolved around the appellants' role as job workers in the manufacture of machine-made dipped matches, supplied with raw materials by another manufacturer. Despite not following the prescribed job work procedure, the Tribunal deemed it a procedural lapse and emphasized that duty liability rested with the raw material supplier. Citing relevant legal provisions and case law, the Tribunal set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalties against the appellants. Furthermore, the Tribunal noted the principal manufacturer's participation in the Sabka Vishwas Scheme (SVLDRS), which had already discharged duty on the goods. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal with consequential relief.
Job-worker or manufacturer - Duty liability - The case revolved around the appellants' role as job workers in the manufacture of machine-made dipped matches, supplied with raw materials by another manufacturer. Despite not following the prescribed job work procedure, the Tribunal deemed it a procedural lapse and emphasized that duty liability rested with the raw material supplier. Citing relevant legal provisions and case law, the Tribunal set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalties against the appellants. Furthermore, the Tribunal noted the principal manufacturer's participation in the Sabka Vishwas Scheme (SVLDRS), which had already discharged duty on the goods. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal with consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
